Health Law
Advisory and representation are provided in compensation claims arising from medical malpractice allegations, patient rights and informed consent matters.
Proceedings involving patients, healthcare professionals and healthcare institutions are conducted with regard to the specific features of healthcare legislation.
Services in This Area
- Advice and representation in compensation claims arising from medical malpractice allegations
- Legal support in civil court claims against private hospitals and physicians
- Full remedy actions before the administrative courts against public healthcare institutions
- Disputes concerning patient rights, informed consent and access to medical records
- Defence support for physicians and healthcare professionals in criminal and disciplinary proceedings
- Representation in disputes arising from aesthetic and dental procedures
- Regulatory compliance advice for healthcare institutions
- Legal support in compulsory professional liability insurance processes
Health Law and the Concept of Malpractice
Health law governs the relationship between patients, physicians and healthcare institutions, and the rights and duties of each. Medical malpractice refers to harm caused by diagnosis, treatment or care falling short of accepted medical standards; it is distinguished from the ordinary risks and complications recognised by medicine.
The Regulation on Patient Rights, the Code of Medical Deontology and related healthcare legislation are among the principal instruments in this field. Informed consent sits at the centre of the analysis: failure to properly inform the patient of the risks and alternatives of a procedure can itself give rise to liability.
How Is a Malpractice Claim Brought and How Does It Proceed?
The judicial route depends on where the harm occurred: claims relating to public hospitals are, as a rule, pursued before the administrative courts following an application to the administration, whereas claims against private hospitals and physicians are brought before the civil courts. Criminal investigations and disciplinary proceedings before professional bodies may also run in parallel.
These cases turn largely on medical records and expert examination; reports of the Forensic Medicine Institute or university boards can be decisive for the outcome. Obtaining the complete patient file is therefore one of the first steps to be taken.
Early Legal Support and the Importance of Evidence
In malpractice matters, medical records, test results and consent forms constitute the core evidence; gathering them promptly and in full allows the claim to be assessed properly. Because application and limitation periods differ according to the judicial route, monitoring time limits is of particular importance.
For physicians and healthcare institutions, building the defence correctly and demonstrating that record-keeping and consent procedures complied with the legislation is equally essential. For both sides, obtaining legal support from the outset helps prevent the loss of rights.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Against whom is a malpractice claim brought?
- If the harmful treatment took place in a public hospital, the claim is, as a rule, brought against the relevant administration before the administrative courts; where a private hospital or independently practising physician is involved, claims are directed at the hospital and/or physician before the civil courts. A criminal investigation against the physician may also be conducted. The correct respondent and judicial route depend on the circumstances of each case.
- What are the time limits in malpractice cases?
- Time limits vary according to the judicial route and the nature of the legal relationship: in the administrative courts, application periods run from the date the harm became known, while in the civil courts the limitation periods for contract or tort claims apply. As missing a deadline can result in the loss of rights, it is advisable to have the matter assessed without delay once the harm is discovered.
- Can compensation be claimed if an aesthetic operation goes wrong?
- Aesthetic procedures are generally treated in practice as contracts for work in which a particular result is promised, so liability for compensation may arise where the promised outcome is not achieved. The scope of the informed consent and the procedure's conformity with medical standards are decisive in this assessment. The outcome depends on the specific facts of each case.
- Where can patient rights violations be reported?
- Applications may be made to the patient rights units within healthcare institutions, the Ministry of Health's communication channels and the relevant provincial health directorate. Depending on the nature of the violation, compensation claims, criminal complaints or disciplinary applications may also be considered. The appropriate route is determined according to the specific case.
These answers are for general information only and do not constitute legal advice. For an assessment of your specific situation, please consult a lawyer.
Request an appointment to talk
Get in touch to discuss your questions and plan the process together.
Meetings are held by appointment, online or in person.